Real people.
Real removal.
Independently Recalculated.
Priwall by mePrism publishes its data-removal efficacy with a defined population, stated procedures, and a practitioner report so enterprise buyers can evaluate the evidence in context.
A defined enterprise population.
Results are based on a representative sample of Priwall's enterprise customers, measured against the records and sources specified in the engagement procedures.
Read the full methodologyEnterprise customers
Representative sample of Priwall's enterprise customers.
Specified sources
Results calculated against the records and sources specified by the engagement procedures.
Confirmator workflow
Procedures include a workflow walkthrough to document how removal status moves through the system.
Recalculation sample
25 records used to test underlying removal evidence across sources and brokers.
Independent recalculation
Sensiba LLP independently recalculated the 30-day and 90-day removal rates.
CR-13 subset
A separate recalculation aligns with the Consumer Reports 2024 source set.
Across a representative sample of Priwall's enterprise customers.
confirmed removal at 30 days
Independently recalculated from the underlying removal-tracking data.
median time to first confirmed removal
A median of 4 days means half of the records reached their first confirmed removal by day four.
independently recalculated
Source-and-broker recalculation sample, queried against corresponding broker pages.
Representative sample
Representative sample of Priwall's enterprise customers.
Context, not a ranking.
Priwall's 90-day result for the CR-13 subset is 100% confirmed removal on 11 of the 12 remaining people-search brokers, with 99.24% on PeopleFinders, subject to the report's stated procedures and definitions.
Consumer Reports tested seven paid services across 13 people-search sites with 32 volunteers over four months. Priwall was not included in that cohort, and the populations are different.
Read the comparison details →11 of 12 brokers
Sensiba's recalculation for the 13-broker Consumer Reports subset covers the 90-day window only.
2024 Data Defense study
Evaluated seven paid services across 13 people-search sites with 32 volunteers over four months.
| Service or cohort | Published / measured result | Measurement context |
|---|---|---|
| Optery | 68% | Consumer Reports 2024, four-month published result |
| EasyOptOuts | 65% | Consumer Reports 2024, four-month published result |
| IDX (then ZeroFox) | 40% | Consumer Reports 2024, four-month published result |
| Kanary | 34% | Consumer Reports 2024, four-month published result |
| DeleteMe | 27% | Consumer Reports 2024, four-month published result |
| ReputationDefender | 6% | Consumer Reports 2024, four-month published result |
| Confidently | 4% | Consumer Reports 2024, four-month published result |
| Consumer Reports paid-service cohort average | 35% | Consumer Reports 2024, four-month published result |
| Consumer Reports manual removal | 70% | Consumer Reports 2024, four-month published result |
| Priwall by mePrism CR-13 subset — 90 days |
100% on 11 of 12 sites; 99.24% on PeopleFinders |
12 of 13 Consumer Reports 2024 people-search brokers; Dataveria has gone offline |
Consumer Reports 2024, four-month published result
Consumer Reports 2024, four-month published result
Consumer Reports 2024, four-month published result
Consumer Reports 2024, four-month published result
Consumer Reports 2024, four-month published result
Consumer Reports 2024, four-month published result
Consumer Reports 2024, four-month published result
Consumer Reports 2024, four-month published result
Consumer Reports 2024, four-month published result
99.24% on PeopleFinders
100% on 11 of 12 sites; 99.24% on PeopleFinders. 12 of 13 Consumer Reports 2024 people-search brokers; Dataveria has gone offline.
Evidence designed
for enterprise buyers.
A defined, independently recalculated claim that can be evaluated in the context of your security, privacy and vendor due diligence requirements.
Procurement
A defined evidence package for RFPs and vendor evaluation.
Security & Trust
A claim-specific record that sits alongside security documentation such as SOC 2 materials.
Executive Protection
Evidence around both the pace and substantiation of removal work.
Questions about the measurement.
Answers about the engagement, the results, the comparison methodology, and what the practitioner report means for enterprise buyers.
Priwall by mePrism's reported removal rates were independently recalculated through an agreed-upon procedures engagement performed by Sensiba LLP under AICPA attestation standards. The practitioner report describes the specified procedures and factual findings so readers can evaluate the work directly.
Read the methodology →Priwall by mePrism's reported removal rate is greater than 92% at 30 days and greater than 99% at 90 days across a representative sample of Priwall's enterprise customers. These figures were independently recalculated through an agreed-upon procedures engagement performed by Sensiba LLP under AICPA attestation standards.
The median time to first confirmed removal in the measured population was 4 days.
The engagement covered a representative sample of Priwall's enterprise customers. The procedures included a Confirmator workflow walkthrough, an observed population extract, a 25-record source-and-broker sample, independent recalculation of the 30-day and 90-day removal rates, and a separate recalculation for the Consumer Reports 2024 source set.
AICPA attestation standards govern engagements such as agreed-upon procedures engagements. A CPA practitioner performs specified procedures on defined subject matter and reports factual findings. Readers draw their own conclusions from those findings, taking the report's stated scope and procedures into account.
No. This was an agreed-upon procedures engagement performed by Sensiba LLP under AICPA attestation standards. It covered specified procedures, rather than a financial-statement audit or a broad evaluation of the company. The practitioner report explains what Sensiba did and what it found within the defined scope.
Consumer Reports' 2024 Data Defense study was an independent consumer-journalism test that evaluated seven paid services across 13 people-search sites with 32 volunteers over four months. Priwall was not included in that cohort. Priwall's practitioner engagement was performed on tracked enterprise data, and its CR-13 subset uses the same named source set for source-level context. The populations and study designs remain different, so the comparison is presented as context rather than a ranking.
Incogni's August 2025 Deloitte report used ISAE 3000 (Revised) and addressed stated process and volume claims, including broker coverage, request cadence, and requests processed. Priwall by mePrism's reported removal rates were independently recalculated through an agreed-upon procedures engagement performed by Sensiba LLP under AICPA attestation standards. The procedures also tested a defined sample of recorded removal statuses. The standards and scopes differ.
Priwall by mePrism uses the confirmed-removal definition stated in its methodology and practitioner report. The reported calculations are based on the records and sources specified by the engagement procedures rather than an unstated estimate of the open web.
Read the methodology →The practitioner report gives procurement teams a defined basis for evaluating the disclosed removal-rate figures, including the measured population, specified procedures, reported calculations, and factual findings. It does not replace a buyer's security review, legal review, privacy assessment, commercial diligence, or service-level evaluation. It provides evidence for the efficacy claim within its stated scope.
Sensiba LLP is a U.S. CPA firm providing accounting, tax, assurance, and advisory services. Priwall by mePrism's reported removal rates were independently recalculated through an agreed-upon procedures engagement performed by Sensiba LLP under AICPA attestation standards.
The signed practitioner report by Sensiba LLP is available directly from the Priwall by mePrism Efficacy page. The report was signed August 18, 2026 and delivered September 11, 2026. The report documents the agreed-upon procedures, scope, calculations, and factual findings.
Read the practitioner report → Read the methodology →The full efficacy results, including the reported removal-rate figures and comparison context, are available on the Priwall efficacy page.
View the efficacy results →Qualified enterprise buyers can request access to the underlying data package under a mutually acceptable NDA. Priwall by mePrism will provide materials permitted by applicable privacy, contractual, and security obligations.